Personally violent crimes and sex offenders are generally lifetime no for me.

I see a lot of violent crimes (shootings) mostly on the west side so I am debating on that market.

The townhome is in a BAD neighborhood: violent crime including armed robberies, theft, and constant drug busts. 2.

She violated the lease by moving a guy in so I asked her to leave (I probably wouldn't have cared if he didn't have a violent criminal history).

Lassen) It should be a tourist haven, as it once was, but no more.Redding is much like many other areas in California, reeling from the crash of the market, and crushed by the AB109 and Prop 47, both of which have released tens of thousands of criminals back onto the street, many of them violent offenders.

Renter occupied: 41 % Population: 46,557 Vacancy rate: 6.1 % Median household income: $33,986 Monthly rent affordability: $849 Crime rate index: Violent: 4, Property: 5 (1-lowest, 5-highest) Ethnicity: White (92 %) , Black (4 %) , Hispanic (3 %) Age groups: Under 18 (24 %), 25 to 34 (16 %), 35 to 44 (14 %) Education: High School (49 %) , College (8 %) , Graduate School (4 %)

I would say that the worst areas in my city have the following problems:1) minor drug dealing2) Welfare renters3) break in and minor crimes4) Very sparse violent crimes (ie. gunshots, stabbings, beatings, rapes, etc.)But, I could definitely walk down the street in the worst areas at night and not really be worried.Does this sound like something like an area you guys would consider?

You can look at seriousness of the crime being violent versus non-violent offenses.

No violent crime, but a decent working class area.

It was allegedly a fight that turned violent and involved alcohol.