![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1295124/small_1695713468-avatar-jimd130.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 August 2019 | 1 reply
@Jim David Hi Jim, a couple lenders my client’s and I have had good experiences with are Matthew Maltese with Supreme & Richard Jerome with On Q Financial.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1397780/small_1621511922-avatar-samueli13.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 January 2022 | 72 replies
It is supremely unlikely that anyone would offer me such a gift, so I would have to earn it.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/826151/small_1621499450-avatar-adamm136.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 July 2019 | 6 replies
The SFH STR reigns supreme.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1354753/small_1621511584-avatar-meirg1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 August 2019 | 13 replies
Originally posted by @Meir Greenblatt:My quick tip of the day is something I heard Today in Show 41.https://open.spotify.com/episo... you are in a tight schedule and you want your contractor to not go and take a lunch break that can last 2 hours or more, Then you can call the contractor and let him know that you got for them some pizza or hamburgers for lunch so they can stay on site and finish the job faster.Financial motive reigns supreme my brother.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/544820/small_1621492213-avatar-r2chi2.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 June 2019 | 0 replies
I just read this article about the Supreme Court allowing property rights cases to go direct to Federal court.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1312411/small_1694824455-avatar-shadane.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
5 July 2019 | 8 replies
@Mark Pedroza hello, I am able to purchase probate cases at my local Supreme Court.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1502048/small_1696086550-avatar-mattheww363.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 September 2019 | 3 replies
.--------------- "The "Howey Test" is a test created by the Supreme Court for determining whether certain transactions qualify as "investment contracts."
23 August 2019 | 18 replies
Even if he loses there, he could file a petition with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to hear the matter.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1453377/small_1692820872-avatar-arte4.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 August 2019 | 9 replies
Where I am it is difficult to prove responsibility as the state supreme court ruled that even not paying rent is not a willful act which pretty much shuts down the Landlord Tenant Act.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/78474/small_1621415372-avatar-cak165.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
19 June 2016 | 18 replies
Most of the actions against the investor/seller were because the court deemed the agreement to be either non-concise or the investor was found to be purposeful in setting up the optionee to fail.Here is an example where the AZ supreme court upheld a lower courts decision that ruled in favot of the seller:[i]A recent Arizona Supreme Court case addressed several of these issues.