Ive heard both from numerous different people but would like an opinion from someone more experienced, thanks!

Just the way I do it but can be done numerous ways.

I’ve asked numerous guys I work with if this is a 24 hour job and all laugh.I guess I could be wrong even if you gave someone ten hours labor but 24?

I've seen this happen numerous times in the past. 

I have spoken with numerous people recently who have stated this.

Once fully satisfied, the split becomes 50/50.When accessing this deal, here’s what went through my mind:A PMP would have to be okay with holding their funds long-termThe borrower would need to be experienced with doing wraps, as it takes time to get willing and able buyerThe borrower would need experience in pivoting to a different exit strategy should they fail to successfully execute a wrapWith NO EQUITY on the property originally, and the PMP being in second position, the borrower would likely need to cross-collateralize if the PMP has NO INTEREST in taking over the propertyMy conclusion, from looking at this from a thoroughly analytical standpoint, would be only someone who has a moderate to high risk tolerance and cares about cash flow without pulling out and parking their money into numerous deals would likely lend on this.Anyways, thoughts anyone?

In my previous role, I encountered numerous instances of real estate fraud, which opened my eyes to the importance of legitimacy and trust in this industry.After months of studying the markets and educating ourselves on the BRRRR method, we are thrilled to have potentially found our first deal, along with other promising prospects.

Search the BP for ADU appraisals to encounter numerous examples.

This resulted in people bringing me deals in the market, helping numerous other buyers invest in the area, and grow an extensive rolodex of team members.

Contact numerous lenders, prepare financial paperwork, and acquire a mortgage pre-approval letter.