This would of course require the consent and willingness of all parties involved in the contract.  

From boyfriend to husband is misrepresentation and that is cause for revocation of the lease.Do it softly but firmly by refunding ALL money's received in exchange for the keys.Had a similar case ending up in a full eviction within three months and had to redo the entire apartment too.

REGARDING Interior Rental Inspections in Indpendence - sorry I got my cities and proposals mixed up.The council voted and it passed - however they said there was nothing the landlords could do, but someone, not sure who discovered that there was a 10 day period where the landlords if they could collect 100 valid signatures on a petition against the ruling, the landlords would then buy 30 days to get several 1000 signatures and force the city council to put the ordinance up to a vote of the citizens and not just the city council.They are collecting signatures - we should have someone at the MAREI meeting listed in the events calendar here on BP who will also collect signatures but you must be a registered voter in the city of Independence.barring that, we also have MO Rep Gary Cross who is a Jackson County Landlord, who would propose state legislation similar to KS that would at least require the tenants consent for the inspection, but this would require landlord support from across the state.

In the state of Texas, the realtor must disclose that to you and have you sign a form acknowledging that fact and giving your consent for them to represent you as the buyer, if they are also representing the seller.

Underwriting may (most likely will) initially balk, but the reality is the loan is originated with your personal guarantee and in your personal name, and the transfer (per my attorney -- get your own to confirm) is de facto written Lender consent because they funded the closing package.

Just create an account and consent to the electronic agreements, then conduct your screening on an as-needed basis.

I did a parcel search and it looks like the house is in the name of a living revocable trust. 

I've read that in a trust, (ir)revocable it's usually those designated to 'benefit' by receiving the assets in the trust created by the "grantor" but that in a land trust it is the the grantor,  or the lender in a deed of trust who is the "beneficiary" rather than those that benefit by ending up with asset the trust was intended to impart the ownership of unto like in a regular trust.

The person isn't trespassing if they're staying there with the tenant's consent, so there's nothing the police can do in this scenario. 

REALTORs at my firm may not manage properties without my consent.