While I dont 100% agree with it, its like the 90 day FHA anti flipping restriction, but more restrictive as it targets any cash/financed transaction for 90 days after closing (or deed recordation more accurately)

(You confirmed something that has been floating in my mind for sometime now.)I often read about all these "creative" options and hustler-approaches to finding a "deal" but often times the things I find are in such poor quality that any sort of rehab (something I too am not eager to do as I have a job) would make it more expensive to buy.I do wonder though, maybe it's just our market, at least in Northern California, comprised of a bunch of angry, anti-government, VC-money-dreaming techies (looks in mirror, haha) so perhaps the midwest reacts better to those letters. 

Leveraging restricts you qualitatively to deals your lender is willing to approve which may lock you out from highly profitable plays and quantitatively in terms of how many deals they will let you do.I'm not anti-leverage but what you said is not right.

It's just too easy to bash Seattle for the crime and anti landlord stances.

Completely anti landlord.

- Is a 203K subject to the 90 day FHA Anti-flip rule? 

Am I anti-college?

Seems a lot like 2000s era stock investors saying that the market can only go up.The Anti-Bay Area extreme:"$1.5m for a house?

I am not anti-LLC, we have several, but mostly because they are required by the lenders.

Really good anti-pick, 10000+ codes but are expensive.