data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3262/e3262ee2cb4c7f365839c21e33f1c11703e19b76" alt=""
24 May 2013 | 27 replies
The other was not fighting homevestors after the government granted my trade mark when they appealed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a07e0/a07e006517e8101be2941c12bd9f0622d419de3c" alt=""
2 July 2018 | 12 replies
And I would consider not using "We Buy Houses" or "We Buy Ugly Houses" as they are both Trademark protected.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78875/78875f862484575ba36257f20105847d87e82fbc" alt=""
3 September 2012 | 5 replies
Ann Bellamy - To continue my point above, just check out the TOS of the site you mentioned and you get the following:Use of Content on SiteMyPublicNotices.com grants you permission (which may be revoked at any time for any reason or no reason) to view this site and to download or print individual pages of this site solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided you do not remove any trademark, copyright or other notice contained in such content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff5f8/ff5f8b56ab0d045e2b7d8651bff0bc03656f3c26" alt=""
29 April 2015 | 5 replies
It was a picture I had from an old computer that I no longer have, lost it, it was almost like a trademark here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f45/51f459549288b4845d99e4e6563a14f5d39c36a5" alt=""
26 December 2015 | 13 replies
I trademarked I Buy Houses, Ugly Ones Too which was approved by the Government however Homevestors brought action during the publish stage and we fought with Homevestor or years and finally settled with the giant.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/398d9/398d954648780309952c03ad207e39da6ef78ed4" alt=""
10 February 2019 | 5 replies
However, lack of knowledge is not a defense to trademark infringement – it’s the responsibility of every business owner ensure they are not infringing on trademarks, copyrights, or patents."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05afe/05afed1a15416241b4bc93774af0a634589f43d8" alt=""
4 March 2014 | 0 replies
I've looked into them and the only thing I can find wrong with them is that they own the friggin trademark for we buy houses.I've already have been requested to remove any references to their trademark from my postcards.First thought was A HOLES.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/604f9/604f93b427022e78c87a9c981a36883230f9b42f" alt=""
2 December 2013 | 4 replies
'We Buy Houses' has been trademarked for a long time, and more recently they sold to a company that now claims to be enforcing the phrase under their trademark rights.It seems like a very generic phrase, so I am wondering if their trademark will actually hold up?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c45f/6c45f897e43a1f8743593f131192167ce97ebd8a" alt=""
13 April 2016 | 34 replies
Such as discussions on Joint Ventures or Limited Liability Companies - all or most posts are of a general nature and are not intended to give advice.I do not know how long you have been online - but most boards and elsewhere - will immediately tell you if you are in violation of any laws, ethics, patent or trademark rights or otherwise!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e468/0e46853d285706da10bc6318ac782f543c1de514" alt=""
27 January 2018 | 2 replies
It is not registered or trademarked so I, personally, don't think there is any way to get into trouble by using the word.