data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dba96/dba966dc98da6a2b4139dc28c83a208a226371dc" alt=""
22 October 2013 | 59 replies
There are so many great pieces of simple, yet far from simplistic, financial advice out there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c922/8c92214b6e94bfc24f7d998974e4c67c4cba8926" alt=""
1 November 2012 | 12 replies
In reality, I can see where a bank's attorney drafted the restriction for the simplist way to comply and where a bank through its institutional thinking will say they can't change a thing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d8d3/3d8d389e68c647784a0671d224cef233eb7526a5" alt=""
12 March 2013 | 8 replies
Hi Maggie,If you follow this simple and simplistic approach to the numbers part you should be okay.Multifamily data shows over time of ownership costs will average 50% of gross expected income and if the landlord pays any utilities that figure will be closer to 60% costs.So 2,900 X 12 months = 34,800 GEI a year. 34,800 / 2 = 17,400 NOINOI is net operating income which is what you have left over before your debt service.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0296a/0296af9258e9b39e3b3c5f19fbf593a5b30b0948" alt=""
20 March 2015 | 6 replies
This may sound simplistic, but I'm looking at trying to buy NPN's on a 4 plex or two.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de837/de8379301e32308bbd2b27f4bfd598886d6e447d" alt=""
13 July 2014 | 6 replies
The simplistic solution is to assign a certain percentage of your monthly rent to repairs. 8% is a fairly common number although I've seen more conservative estimates.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a15d/7a15da2d909f2bd49bd11aa4da1ad2a34a5d813b" alt=""
26 August 2014 | 27 replies
To speak simplistically.. if getting out of debt is the goal, you need to maximize monthly cash flow right now.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6738/b67383afd6382e61b6cbfa2c00e3de2f050740e2" alt=""
3 April 2014 | 17 replies
I will go that low also if the tenant has very low debt so that their income isn't being stretched.A good related read:http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/52/topics/114033-gross-income-3x-rent-too-simplistic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27d19/27d198e5634963cd63bc3c471e1563001e8b1eb4" alt=""
3 April 2014 | 3 replies
the simplist resolution I could provide is to come back to the seller and advise her that your financial partners are requesting to be place on the deed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
31 August 2012 | 41 replies
Here is my overly simplistic scenario:I think I would leverage the 2M in to something like 8M through traditional financing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c401f/c401fe1246e277416a0e220858af7ba385bba284" alt=""
9 January 2014 | 14 replies
3x income seems too simplistic, though it is also what my PM uses.