data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86dbf/86dbf252de39f87e89e052593c5d0e4d781d71f4" alt=""
29 January 2025 | 24 replies
Lenders often have strict policies when a property is in a FEMA-designated disaster area to protect their risk, even if the property isn’t directly impacted.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66a5c/66a5c06f2289f0ad477c0edf208b807d8edca4c2" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 4 replies
(If you are out of state, you may seriously consider using a good property manager because of screening tenants, vandalism, squatting, and various other reasons -- they do protect your investment).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1742/c1742641e3050ef4a84c786dc11dcf9adddb45eb" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 10 replies
These laws have been tested in court and upheld because they do not discriminate against protected classes.Familial status in Fair Housing pertains to the presence of children (pregnant women, people with children, adoptive or foster parents).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfe92/cfe92112f048c23bc0ed925c92da55c743e5c5b9" alt=""
25 January 2025 | 155 replies
They will be more focused on finding a buyer for a deal vs what date the DD ends and EMD is owed to the seller and most likely not be cancelling the contract or extending the DD to protect the lenders EMD funds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05ed7/05ed767f96183eb995cc1c5feed0efd04712ee3f" alt=""
17 January 2025 | 12 replies
@Paulette Midgette I haven't looked at that statute in a while but I would check to see if the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act ("HICPA") applies to this situation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dda3/1dda3823695e88399ef74b06f7d880ea58f312a6" alt=""
17 January 2025 | 19 replies
If you choose to play with fire, that is your perogative.For your reference, here is a good primer.Here is the key paragraph:Rental discrimination is when a landlord or property manager treats an applicant differently based on the applicant’s inclusion in a protected class.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/492d3/492d3ac1f4ab21a3c5df1ccbba885bb880f60770" alt=""
12 January 2025 | 7 replies
I will preface this with the fact that I have a legal background, specifically with estate planning and asset protection.
8 February 2025 | 89 replies
Finds (1) half of what plaintiffs told him is incorrect or untrue; the potential defendant has filed all the correct paperwork for Reg D and hence has “statutory” protection against almost all but fraud; unlike what the plaintiffs believe and told the attorney the risks WERE disclosed to them, NO specific return was promised them; and the defendants have not stopped communications; they merely grew tired of the 82 daily phone calls asking, accusing, and raging by the same three plaintiffs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc210/bc21067b3314e02a26c0101d22dd5cc5fc8b4730" alt=""
24 January 2025 | 11 replies
On the other hand, pros include increased cash flow, engineer-based data for the clients CPA, audit protection (with the right firm) and the ability to deflect that recapture fee with a 1031 transaction.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d453/1d453e43fad2ce3fb90822ec3789141df95c8a2d" alt=""
23 January 2025 | 24 replies
To protect your deal, you can:1.