As long as you are not a borrower, there is no note or loan that will negatively affect your dti from a debt perspective.

In the example you outlined and in the case of what a lot of people are doing right now (super high LTV underlying, negative equity on wrap, 100% financing for the buyer, low note rate, etc), then no, this wont work, primarily because whomever created the wrap note is either an idiot or a fraud.  

Nothing else.Every other platform doesn't have the reach that the 2 big ones have and in some cases are very owner negative.

I think this will correct itself over the next 3 - 5 years but it will make cashflow tight or negative until then.I have a great contact of a Realtor that works primarily with investors who has represented a few of my borrowers that I can share with you.

At least 3 of the reviewers from 10 years ago posted once only ever, which seems to point to them being asked by Incite/Matt Scott to counter the negative review.

I'm surprised you're still hearing negative things about it considering there's been so much positive press and chatter lately.

The service call on a used appliance would negate any money saved. 

Also, focus on 2 years of job/income stability.Class D Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, all cashflow with little, maybe even negative, relative rent & value appreciationVacancy Est: 20%+ should be used to cover nonpayment, evictions & damages.Tenant Pool: majority will have FICO scores under 560 (almost 30% probability of default), little to no good tradelines, lots of collections & chargeoffs, recent evictions.

I predict that the guys who are fully leveraged and cash flowing $100 per month will be motivated sellers when the next big correction happens.actually its either them or they walk and its their lenders selling that is what happened in that time period.. and was pronounced in certain markets.for me personally  I don't want to risk  my credit and finances and borrow 75k to make 1200 a year... or even 2400 a year if its a market that has a history of no appreciation and I don't feel there is going to be any significant appreciation.. 2 to 3% a year does not cut it.but I will take 500 a month negative or 10k a month negative if I think there are huge gains at the other end.. 

There is no such absolute rule or mandate for REI - it is up to you on your comfort level with your cash flow versus total investment versus appreciation potential.If I followed that rule, I would have missed out on a LOT of great opportunities over the years.We bought a house in Jones Valley in 2017 with negative cash flow - why?