I have it configured this way because statistically speaking, according to past industry "market testing" you get more conversions when you force signups.

This real estate property type reverts back to the classic, 1980’s configuration of commercial mixed use, with retail at the street level and residential above.

I like your approach, but my shed has only one door and would be hard to re-configure, unfortunately

. ($.75-$1 per word) Hire a programmer off elance to configure it all the way we want. ($33 per hour.

Market Rents: $1750, $1600 = $3350NOI: $3350 - $1379.15 = $1970.85 -> $24,250 per yearExpense:Income -> 41.2% Cashflow: 3350 – (1379.15+1778.47) = 192.38 -> 96.19 per door.There are two projects I have planned for the property in the near future: replacing the 30 year old boiler with a high efficiency one (should knock $100 off heating) and converting the 2bed/3bed configuration to a 3bed/3bed by adding 1 wall, 1 window, and 1 door by splitting the extra large bedroom above the garage.

Comps are simply what other houses(similar configuration, age, square footage, geographical area) have sold for. 

While Qbooks is a robust system that can be configured for property management, it is certainly NOT a property management solution.

Common commercial loan configurations: a. 100 CLTV (OO-NO DOC)b. 97 LTV (if OO-FULL DOC)c. 95 CLTV (if NOO-FULL DOC)d.

Is there another you recommend, that is easily configurable by a 3rd party consultant?

If the unit configurations would comply with duplex occupancy as a triplex, you should be fine.