That can play a big part when issuing terms. 

In playing with the numbers a bit, I'm seeing a trend of atleast 2% rent to price and (ideally) < 7% mortgage rate needed to achieve a decent cash on cash rate.

So if you had 20 of them, you're talking about a huge retirement kicker that you can build.If you're up there higher in age (i.e. 40's or 50's), then the long play doesn't make as much sense. 

They simply took a play out of the Santarelli and Fossum financial fraud playbook and promised 25% annual returns to investors.Unfortunately for those investors, by late 2022, investors stopped receiving payments and were literally “re-upped” or re-solicited by Lopez and Mehr for more money to help them avoid bankruptcy.

This brings a much greater liability into play, and in my opinion provides greater balance.Is this offering the best “deal” for a passive investors?  

You just have to do a LOT of homework and play by the rules.

Looking for a long term play with rent stability more than making huge cash flow.

This platform has played such a key role in my journey over the years.

The specific assistance organization, the screening of the tenant, the property, and the PM company that should be communicating with the tenant all play a role in the success of your investment in regards to tenants.

So it can be good for cash flow and building in tighter spaces but it is less of a equity play in today's market if you're looking to sell right away