If it was discussed and just a typo and its a good tenant it should be fine but some tenants would definitely take advantage of this.

What's the advantage here? 

Since few lenders have the stomach to do this, it’s also been a great competitive advantage for our business.This horrifies almost every private lender I know.

This is a great place to learn and to connect with people so take advantage of all the great resources.

This destroys the credit of the original owner who can then sue the subto buyer.Another issue is if the subto seller claims they were taken advantage of by the subto buyer at a vulnerable time (pre-foreclosure) and an attorney or regulator raises the question of equity skimming.

I wholeheartedly agree there are a lot of (too many) "gurus" hocking seminars and workshops and taking advantage of inexperienced, aspiring investors so they can sell more seminars and workshops and swindle more people.

The “buyer beware” philosophy is fine for commercial transactions, but taking “advantage” of home owners when they’re most vulnerable and lack market sophistication is something no right thinking person wants.  

Since the contributions have to come from the business income (PM biz) it’s not likely you’ll come close to taking advantage of the high contribution limits of a Solo 401k.

You can spread your cash out pretty far here when taking advantage of leverage opportunities like 100% purchase/100% rehab hard money loans.

Foundations and framing were built better 100 years ago and there are some advantages to older homes.