Some folks will argue properties are typically taxed less than their fair market value, and that may be true, but it's the amount of annual taxes your pay (regardless of actual value or assessment) that will affect your bottom line.Additionally, until the recent market correction both property values and rents have increased at a rapid rate.

I don't have to argue the morality of the free market, capitalism vs socialism, or anything else.  

just crazy to even consider an ADU in linden it's the silliest thing I've ever heard of Yeah, im not arguing for or against the business case.

He wasn't too happy about the situation, but it's kind of hard to argue with the visual evidence sitting on the table right in front of him.He gave us a credit and we closed.

Solid post and would agree with everything - but the last one - "Local or National Expert" - I do think there is still value here but I would say this is the one area that is being I'd argue reduced in importance via technology and ability to reach people digitally and remotely - but like you said, its really more important for people trying to scale - where if its your first or second, local probably makes a lot of sense

2 years worth of data is hard to argue with.

Although this seems trivial, I have seen friends argue over less.

Each investor will be different, but I don't think anyone will argue that more experience is WORSE than less.Same with Conservative Underwriting.  

Some would argue that Texas doesn't have state income tax but who cares because you get all the write offs anyways.

Especially in Milwaukee.And I would argue that average appreciation over long periods of time, have not much to do with hope.