What I have failed to see in this discussion is any mention of the constitution.

Actually, that could be two with the financing question for each I guess.These are or should be the most common situations and from the response to such questions, you should be able to apply the preceived rule in other areas.As to individual investors, you can certainly try to get a letter of opinion, stating you are in the business and "that such business constitutes a significant amount of the business conducted" that may help, as if they think it's just one homy trying to sell a house, they will tell your to see your attorney!

But, on most fiscal and Constitutional issues, I'm a Libertarian (and I'm equally proud of that).

He lies to the people, goes around the Constitution, and doesn't do anything he promised he could do.... and yes, he had total 100% control of BOTH houses.

That does not constitute a contract.Put on your investor/landlord hat and tell the father, regardless of what his actions are, that his son has been declined.I would likely tell the father to pound sand and ask if he would like my lawyers contact information.

I can afford a nice vehicle, but don't care to spend money on depreciating assets at this time.In regards to buying a car and having the business lease it, I am not sure how this constitutes additional income. 

IRS has a tests as to what constitutes an employee. 

Account Closed you have to delineate Constitutional rights v. family law issues. 

Originally posted by Greg C: the right to own and bear arms is a importain right that has been given to you as a american dont be to quick to dump on it, I never have (and never will) argue with importance of upholding the Constitutional right to carry a gun...That said, if you're carrying it for protection, you clearly care about your health.

Under the second Proposal, the EPA is asking for comment on the Development of a Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule to apply to: 1.Exteriors of Public and Commercial buildings 2.If lead-based paint hazards are determined to exist, Interiors of Public and Commercial buildings Please see the Federal Register/Vol. 75, No 87/ Thursday, May 6, 2010/ Proposed Rules page 24848 for further information on this second proposal Comments must be submitted by one of the following three ways: 1.Online at the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov 2.Mail: Document Control Office (7407), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington DC 20460-0001 3.Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA East Building, Rm 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC; Attention _____________ (appropriate Docket Number) Please ensure that you annotate the appropriate docket number for the proposals on which you are commenting: 1.Dust Wipe Tests— EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049 2.RRP for Public and Commercial Buildings— EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173 For your convenience, EPA’s Renovate Right pamphlets may be obtained from EPARenovateRightPamphlets.com Additionally, EPA Certified Renovator (RRP) course offerings are available at EPACertifiedRenovatorClasses.com Thank you, Rob Dowse [email protected] CONNOR Institute