
18 September 2008 | 1 reply
You could possibly run the risk of mistaken identity.

16 September 2008 | 4 replies
The following is what I found.Seq#Sale DateSale PriceSale Type1 06/01/1979 (obsolete sales codes) 2 08/23/1991 $03 12/11/1995 $315,000 Good sale; verified 4 08/20/1996 $537,000 Good sale; verified 5 09/26/2002 $0 6 10/28/2002 $07 12/15/2003 $280,000 REO Sale-Gvmt/Financial Inst 8 09/13/2005 $09 09/15/2005 $0 Foreclosure 10 11/10/2005 $011 11/01/2006 $0 Good sale; verified 12 11/14/2006 $013 01/29/2007 $1,047,000 REO Sale-Gvmt/Financial Inst It seems that this unfortunate properties has been foreclosed twice.

2 January 2019 | 14 replies
Well, I knew things were not well priced here, but your input verifies my opinion.

18 January 2010 | 29 replies
Of course you should verify all numbers prior to making an acutual offer (i.e. if you figured insurance to be $100 a month and it's really $200, your viability could go out the window.)

25 September 2008 | 6 replies
And I am pricing this security/condo at $230K and it WILL sell at this price and I will be able to pay it back, as we are actually verifying my income etc. so my security will actually be worth something.But with this bailout...

22 October 2008 | 6 replies
I have another rental down the street that is almost identical.

8 October 2008 | 3 replies
Buyers have the 3 items needed great credit, verifiable income and assets reserves.

9 October 2008 | 9 replies
I paid $20K for it and an almost identical house literally across the street recently sold for $52K.

31 October 2008 | 13 replies
A nearly identical house literally across the street sold recently for $52,000.

28 October 2008 | 12 replies
The $1051 they stated includes the taxes (which I verified, and what they stated is accurate), the water and gas, insurance (they're stated wasn't far off from my quote), maintenance, and reserves.They claimed 99% occupancy over the past five years.