If you bought an existing home and it had a massive problem your inspector didn't catch, your deal could go under.Am I wrong to think about it this way?

These clowns are so desperate to catch a sucker, they probably waste 90% of their time having conversations about how to invest and just keep trying to push them into their market when the person doesn't even have money or a pre-approval.

That's sort of the catch, the larger the building and the more amenities it has, the more rules you will run into. 2-3 story walk-ups in nice neighborhoods could be a good place to start, lower HOA fees too.  

Ellijay and Blairsville are late coming to the vacation rental game, but are trying to catch up quickly.  

Right now, the one that has been catching my attention the most is the BRRRR method.

Over the months it will take them to catch up this will save them several hundred in fees but I am also collecting that balance.

Great news for the local investors, bad news for the California absent landlords (our software catches/filters by property location and borrower primary residence, there might for example be a lender in California that lends nationwide but requires the borrower to live in their 3-county footprint, and every other configuration of that you can imagine).

My wife and I love to catch a few waves in New Smyrna and visit St Augustine from time to time.

Here’s the catch: I’m not sure how to go about getting a loan with no current employment.

During that time, I've found no compelling macro thesis for putting my investors' (and my) money at risk catching this falling knife.