I just simply will not work with a lender that will solicit my client, have no punitive language in regard to if they circumvent our firm or solicit them, and I want nothing to do with the lenders that want to directly face our client throughout the process.

Proactive communication, addressing issues head-on with plain language, acknowledging mistakes and not just blaming "the market" or "interest rates".I am invested with a few operators who have made capital calls - all of them came as a surprise and only one was messaged appropriately. 

Here's my lease language:(k) Yards, patios, balconies, vestibules, hallways, and entrances may not be used to store belongings or to dry clothes.

In my state there is boilerplate language in the contract stating that if there is damage after the inspection but before close, the seller must repair to the buyer satisfaction.

Just make sure the language of the lease is right so as to not suggest you can double charge rent.  

@Paul De Luca and/or @Jonathan Klemm - would you be willing to share your Chicago-specific lease agreements or what language you use in your leases for the early termination so we can incorporate that into our future leases?

You don't get it everywhere else, so respecting those answers is crucial in my opinion.This is why Also I prefer AI that do lot more algorithms in "Natural Language" rather than AI LLM which specialises more in open-ended questions.

They have a good exchange rate and English is the primary language.

Please note: some mortgages may have language that prevents this or requires additional hoops to jump through, I would suggest you contact your lender and understand each of the mortgages you have as to where they stand on ownership transfer. 

The industry language has never worked for me...I look at things logically, not emotionally.