This results in a few things. 1) They will allow for 5% down (with insurance, of course). 2) They give you a lower rate than investment properties (because of the lower perceived risk, aka you don't want to go homeless). 

My advice is to seek out a SFH where you can put 10% to purchase a Vacation home (less money out of pocket, wooohoo!)

homeless relief or a place for the food bank or soup kitchen.

In a proper business entity structure, you wouldn't have one business (LLC) paying another business's bills, unless it's your S-Corp (operating company) handling payments for the LLCs.Remember that if you're holding property in your own name, you're one lawsuit away from potential homelessness.

-MIT’s RajagopalCities already have the option to provide free housing for the homeless, but they don't.

If you are investing for long term then whether the situation in Michigan corrects itself or not people will always need a place to live unless they want to be homeless.

Also,  Neither I or my other siblings want to force my unemployed brother and sister out of the house because we do not want them to be homeless.

Worst case scenario: if your business fails what is your exit strategy to not being homeless?

There are homeless everywhere and poop on the streets.

What is the difference between her son, who is not on the lease, and a homeless person, who is not on the lease?