I try to find tenants with good, stable income (such as military or government personnel)who care about having to pay for any possible damage they might do to someone else's property because they have "collectible" income and usually financial goals that might entail having to use credit.

I was hoping there might be RE accountant who could clarify.Also unfortunately, there're the usual suspects among BP syndicators who jump on every post mentioning K1s/syndications with their misleading assertions that K1 losses, including cost segregation, are deductible by passive partners.

Your words were as a lawyer is I look at case law and the case law does not support your assertion.   

Some people will simple post their resumes and not even seriously see what the job entails if they didn't follow that one simple step and post what was asked of them in the subject line I wouldn't even open the email.

Renee, I think you're doing just fine, and it's quite clear you are acting in a professional manner, not trying to establish a relationship with your tenants.I'm interested, however, in your assertion that it is a legal requirement in NH to send your tenants a certified letter when you assume the property.

On what data did you base that assertion?

In my mind, "apples-to-apples" entails much more.  

Not sure what that entails but my understanding is the taxes are less.

I figure it will entail: 1) jackhammering, 2) removal of rubble and dirt, 3) pouring a new concrete floor.

I'm paying nowhere near the amount that you're asserting that others have paid.