
4 December 2007 | 18 replies
Hence agents are happy to host an open house for a listed property as they can sell a different property in many cases.Be careful about focusing on saving the commission vs. getting the property sold.John Corey

11 December 2007 | 22 replies
Any time there is a realtor involved, you are paying a commission (OK, the seller pays but the buyer pays indirectly).

1 November 2007 | 4 replies
I recently wholesaled two properties and I am going to make a commission of $20,000 or more!

15 November 2007 | 12 replies
To John and others,doesn't it make sense to get your license just to save on commissions?

5 November 2007 | 4 replies
I did have my real estate license in the late 80's but didn't like listing properties for a commission.

7 December 2007 | 1 reply
If he lowered his % when you buy a property it may make a small difference to the seller, as in they would pay a little less for his fees since the seller pays the commissions.

18 December 2007 | 8 replies
The description says the Commission found him to have violated Revised Code 4735.02, unlicensed activity, but doesn't really elaborate any further on how this was an unlicensed activity.
21 December 2007 | 2 replies
I pay the realtor a commission up front, using in part, the option fee the buyer paid me.

11 February 2008 | 18 replies
Typically on properties that are a bit skinny on profit, but are still nice properties, selling via lease option is a great way to fatten up the profits. i.e. no real estate commission to pay to sell equals another 5% or 6% profit… And you can get top dollar for the sales price which can add another 5%-10% onto your profit!
2 January 2008 | 6 replies
One would have to include some kind of commission for the realtor in this deal.