In my experience that either means there is something prohibitive in the zoning, or there simply is not much demand for that sort of product if most people either go with an apartment in a large complex or rent a SFR.

If you have questions or simply would like to brainstorm ideas about cohosting, MTRs, or real estate investing from a regulatory standpoint, feel to reach out!

You accused me of a lot of things here my man… a lot of things that simply not true.

Quote from @Bryan Christopher: Quote from @Russell Brazil: I'd simply ignore them. 

That means there is not really an effect on the debt to income ratio neither positive (income) or negative (loss) but rather simply making that payment  non issue. 

I'll settle for a variation of this and give a little, but I simply pass on PMs who hand me a term sheet with 10+ different types of fees.

And there is a constant mention of Guaranteed returns there is no Guarantee unless its the federal govmit on 250k or less FDIC insured .. this was simply investor greed.. investors did not understand what they were investing in what the risks were and were blinded by the returns offered.. no one put a gun to their head.. investor make bad investments all the time..  

I am guessing his hands are tied as Norada is simply the marketing company and I am guessing no operational control of Wagner.

They've ruined many financial lives and simply don't care. 

If its a ground up tear down, it'll be significantly more expensive than a cosmetic rehab simply due to time and labor costs alone.