data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/012d1/012d18f34de5e7a21299111f898bfbfa3079332c" alt=""
4 February 2025 | 2 replies
We put it on the market at $3M but never got the offers we wanted, it was during the holidays and when rates were skyrocketing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0853f/0853ffb654fe829998a65d11eaa8946571ec1d18" alt=""
3 February 2025 | 15 replies
However, an easier option would be to use a bridge loan to help with acquisition and rehab financing if the property needs some work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df233/df233fce85319581ab08c381db0863fc62996aab" alt=""
10 February 2025 | 7 replies
That might be an option.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d4b5/4d4b59d8ba330cb16326fce10e4c26e566b8f0fd" alt=""
18 February 2025 | 4 replies
I have heard about doing deals with little to no cash down but I'm skeptical about whether creative financing options are truly viable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f63e3/f63e325b6378ba79df52d4ce39c32f883bb6d12b" alt=""
22 February 2025 | 4 replies
If you're househacking, Conventional is likely the best option for you and will only require 5% down on multifamily.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2bdb/d2bdb815c5bcb6c95c7a449301087bde9b81ad45" alt=""
29 January 2025 | 2 replies
I will start from the offer stage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4baca/4baca3b075c94e05e0c9fffc53777ef8f8146967" alt=""
28 January 2025 | 6 replies
@Max Bellino For smaller properties like your 2–4 unit multifamily buildings, an online cost segregation study is a quicker and more cost-effective option, providing sufficient accuracy for straightforward properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5de3/e5de34fcd88024ad78ec1acd9d0cfe3b518f9530" alt=""
29 January 2025 | 2 replies
Since you already have an offer, it’s not really about whether the property will sit for six months, it’s about whether keeping it makes financial sense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99476/994767943a5495be92afab625390f6f6339bdb17" alt=""
17 February 2025 | 6 replies
This makes targeting distressed sellers, such as those in pre-foreclosure, or those with ballooning debt that was taken out in 2020-2021 when the interest rate was 7.37x lower (8/09/2020 the 10-year treasury was .56%, 1/15/2024 the 10-year treasury is 4.69%) making it very difficult for those that underwrote the property in 2020 to have predicted refinancing at these rates and likely a sale is their only option.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16e6c/16e6c5a2bdd2b9369ae0c2f608010f12ad50a385" alt=""
13 February 2025 | 123 replies
I didn't like the fact of calling up sellers just to offer sub to or seller financing.