
12 November 2016 | 38 replies
My question is if I make an offer and it's accepted, what sorts of contingencies can I put in my purchase offer that can allow me to back out if needed an not lose any deposit/earnest money?

3 December 2012 | 16 replies
I should have known better Steve, LOL, I stand corrected, strange but okay, doe each cell do business in the company name or is there an annotation, like... one, two, three?

6 April 2018 | 13 replies
As we reached the hallway I asked him what he thought of the test; "easy as pie".As far an not needing to know how to calculate how much concrete it takes to pour a driveway.
20 May 2012 | 9 replies
On the books you can annotate expenses reimbursed to you and declare such for taxes.

16 February 2020 | 7 replies
I an not recommending this, nor is it to be considered legal advice.

30 April 2016 | 18 replies
Then I'd be on the ready for her to loose it and catch it all on video - call cops or county health.Next, I think went letting out rooms there is some sort of addendum that says this is not a lease agreement and does not establish a landlord tenant arrangement, so on and so forth - so that when someone does not live up to say - maintaining a clean living environment - you could just change locks an not allow them further access to your house - naturally you would have to have their stuff packed and outside for them when they return to get it.

18 April 2016 | 24 replies
Even in a situation where one would break even, the appreciation, tax break, and owning an asset, clarifies owning an not renting.
27 May 2015 | 11 replies
Original signed documents will pass the sniff test, deposit that cash immediately in the LLC account, the deposit slip can be annotated on the back as to what rents were paid.Being consistent in your record keeping is critical, might be that attorney simply thought the administration would be too much for you and advised you not to accept cash making your life easier, but s/he still needs to explain.Get with your accountant too!

18 November 2015 | 11 replies
That before they go any further, they should read that article and all of the annotated laws that say they must accommodate you.The article's conclusion basically says that municipals should be aware that it would be very costly for them to fight a claim of discrimination on group homes.I'm such a law geek.

22 June 2015 | 15 replies
It's a with them an not against them type of positioning where it's hard for them to see you as the enemy.