Maybe they are good people and want to pay for the damages and remove the remaining tree?

Its a tough subject because logically, they are joint and several guarantys so rationally a 100% guaranty from each of two people (one 740 one 680 for example) is ALWAYS going to be better than just one 100% guaranty from someone at 740 (so it wouldn't make sense to have a better rate for the latter)The problem is that there is fraud and "straw borrowers" out there where someone who is not involved in the property signs on to boost score and terms - so many DSCR Lenders in response either do the "non-rational" thing and price to the lower to avoid the fraud or use the higher of the two (and either be a little loose with things or just stay vigilant on any funny business)

In one of our companies, we have a board comprised of people with different expertise.

But we are backed up by a large group of successful people who have done this for years, as well as an advisor that has been wonderful!

I recommend going to deals analysis and posting the projected numbers along with your overall experience and let people comment that way.

Your point about people from finance and veggies really cracked me up!!

But some people are the type that cringe at price tags.

I'm curious to hear other people's experience getting utilities activated for inspections or appraisals on HUD homes while under contract.

People are investing in real estate in Ohio from all over the world.

The way that things like this are typically handled is that if a lawsuit were to happen, since both people have been behaving under the assumption of a lease (the landlord renting their space and the tenant paying rent), they would probably treat it as if there was a standard month to month lease agreement.