If for some stupid reason the parties overlooked this in negotiating the sale of the building then the new owner is stuck for what ever is down as security deposit on those leases and is responsible for honoring that to his new tenants.

@Bobby BarlowYou are a disqualified party to your Solo 401k.  

Note it mentions transaction relationship: in that scenario the agents are not representing either party...only the transaction with the hopes of getting it closed.

Access to 9 or 10 figures of government and business capital (let alone $58M) did not save them.It didn't matter if his dad gave him a $5MM or $500MM loan, walking into a room to build rapport, convince the other party that you can close, that you can revitalize the area or the city, that you will get bank financing, etc. takes a lot more than money.$58M.. by the way, the left media has already thrown around so many figures of this supposed loan from his dad, I think I have heard at least 8 numbers already.

@Anthony Harris - What I would recommend is if you are really interested in the property get a 3rd party appraisal that you and the seller split the costs for.

I am looking for things like: - investors on the move in the area- deals happening in the area and associated parties- Also, what is happening in other markets outside of Tampa (i.e. 1-4 corridor, Panhandle, SFL, Jax)Basically I want to know the players and the games they are playing.

Disclaimer: I'm not a legal professional, however if a party attempts to make a claim on a property who's name wasn't originally on tittle when mortgage was originated is a legal term called "unjust enrichment".

Whether through representation, wholesaling or investing, I will work hard to provide the service needed and help all parties profit.  

If the agent is getting both ends of the commission then shouldn't the agent  be representing both parties?

It's far better to look for other triggers like foreclosure and defaulted taxes where the motivation is much clearer to all parties.