If anyone tries to bust your hump about it, just report them to the board.Part of the problem we have with these wild-wild-west agents is that not enough people report them for rules that are already on the books.

Someone, either real estate agent or lawyer, dropped the ball on this one and unfortunately for you looking for a legal loop hole is nothig more than a wild shot at the moon in this case. 

Doesn't hurt to think outside the box and get wildly creative with the Internet and various other social platforms.

You are obviously in California and we have wild ups and downs in the market about every 10 years. 

Am I on a wild goose chase for cash flow or is my agent right about having to take loses or break even for a few years?

I did a bunch of these in the day.. that's why I always say the most fun I ever had in real estate was my logging days.. it was wild. we did quite well.

I was hoping that someone would be able to point out any errors, or let me know if I'm just wildly off the mark on how an analysis goes.

At this time I'm not subscribing to any wild theories like the GC wants it for himself.  

You're seeing first hand that CA is wildly overinflated, and we all know where that goes.

Using the upper versus lower bounds of these ranges seems to give me wildly different results in the calculator, leading me to many "potential maybes" -- so many that it seems like too much to ask for her opinion on.