Outdoor destinations and national parks will be more appealing than a trip to a vast city with tickets to a sporting or concert event.

For example: Necessities - Mortgage, Insurance, Gas, etc; Play - Dining Out, Entertainment, Concerts/Sporting Events, etc; Investments - Property Purchas Fund, Whole Life Policy, Stocks, etc. 

Just my two cents on that topic.In recent history, Philadelphia has been making significant efforts to be considered and recognized as a tier-1 city (ie- bid for Amazon's HQ2, new convention center, big concerts, etc.) so I'd say it's trying to diversify.  

With all due respect, I think the people playing that "landlords are irresponsible and only have themselves to blame" are part of a concerted neoliberal effort to squeeze out small landlords out of the real estate market.My parents couldn't have been more fiscally responsible.

I had one in Kearns for a while and had people coming to visit family, ski trips, conventions, concerts.  

This is a unique situation available due to those concerts.

And even when they are allowed to open, I think it will still be slow until the majority of concert-goers feel it is safe.

If that isn't bad enough, you could be flirting with loan fraud because the whole transaction was orchestrated with the intent to defraud the lender, or even conspiracy because the act was committed in concert with others.The only way this can work is if the lender agrees to allow the seller to remain in the property as a tenant (unlikely) and there is no pre-arranged sellback.

Its not for a night out on the town, a restaurant, concert tickets or anything like that.

I would rather take a field trip of second graders to a Justin Bieber concert than watch that stupid show again.