They tend to cost more to construct then they add in value, they are generally more valuable for a property you are holding as a way to generate more income.

These areas tend to provide the best balance of affordability and rental demand.That said, Detroit’s market is unique.

I've learned a lot from talking to RE attorneys, since they tend to be on both sides of those partnership deals.

Good summary of what your market is looking for but as we all know, each market tends to have its "wish / want" items which differ from market to market.Flow is definitely a selling point but make adjustments come with a cost. 

Even if you go "vertical", that tends to require an architect as well. 

They tend to have less fluff and more actionable useable content.

Three and four units properties tend to be slightly more investor facing, but there are still a lot of regular buyers that pick up three and four units as well.

Durham tends to offer slightly better cash flow opportunities compared to Raleigh, especially if you’re targeting neighborhoods that are up-and-coming but still affordable.

From what I’ve heard, properties that emphasize tranquility.. like offering outdoor seating areas, fire pits, or even something as simple as a hammock.. tend to perform exceptionally well in remote settings.You’re spot on about STR policies in Johnson City versus Knoxville.

If properties in that area tend to appreciate more slowly, especially if you can't start renovations immediately, you may sit on that investment watching potential profits get eaten away at slowly as inflation passes appreciation.