People need place to live, I and my investors need to safeguard my investment.

I have also sold properties subject to; but with safeguards in place so we had a path of problems occurred. 

Provide transparency so neither party feels “tricked” into a deal.Offer tools like secondary markets for token holders to sell their income rights if they wish to exit.The aim is to facilitate fair, mutually beneficial agreements—not to worsen deals for either side.This idea is designed for specific types of property owners (long-term holders who need liquidity) and investors (those seeking passive real estate income without ownership complexities).There are risks, like any financial agreement, but with proper transparency, legal safeguards, and investor education, it can work as a niche alternative to traditional real estate investing.Would love to hear your thoughts on what else might need to be clarified or improved in such a proposal. sounds like you have already convinced yourself this is the next big thing, so let us know in a few years how it goes. 

Switching the utilities into their name without safeguards in place—knowing the tenant might act out—seems like a misstep on their part.While it’s true you’ll ultimately have to cover the cost, it doesn’t feel entirely fair for you to shoulder the consequence of their decision.

This action would greatly enhance investor confidence, demonstrate goodwill, and help safeguard our investments.

Staying proactive not only protects your tenants but also safeguards your investment.

You take this action to safeguard yourself in the event that the general contractor neglects to compensate the subcontractors.

Sure, you can apply a huge contingency to anything as a safeguard but that won’t help you win many deals.

However, lenders often add their own requirements, and many interpret the “intent to occupy” as a longer-term commitment, sometimes defaulting to the 1-year rule as a safeguard. 

Clear communication and legal safeguards are essential for a successful partnership.