For those interested, a combination of mortgages with no “due on sale” clause, mortgage companies loose due diligence, and title insurers willingness to “turn a blind eye” to practices that wouldn’t pass scrutiny now, resulted in tactics like the “second mortgage crank” which not only allowed investors to purchase properties with no money out of pocket but allowed investors to actually walk away from closing with “cash in their pocket”.

C+ we will do but we know it's a net 0 so it's on value of relationship because odd's are we will loose $ on 3/4 of those.

9) adding multiple ADUs or adding an ADU to a quad looses F/F conventional financing.

So you are not bound to "bird dog" for them. 

Was it indeed just locked, or did the latch mechanism fail, which often happens with bedroom sets that have plastic components in that mechanism; or did the screws that secure the latch into the door come loose, allowing the latch and/or the screws to prevent the door from opening...also not an uncommon event.

Nothing in the ones I am talking about were out of bounds at all. 

They aren't particularly liquid and its easy to loose a lot of interest with a cash-in before maturity.

Everything is case by case but from what I've seen you can almost never loose holding long term.

What I've found is that it offers too many configurations and if the user isn't aware of what the outcomes are, it can actually make them loose more money faster.

A 4-bed, 3-bath rambler with a large lot in a high-demand area is bound to attract buyers.