However, lenders often add their own requirements, and many interpret the “intent to occupy” as a longer-term commitment, sometimes defaulting to the 1-year rule as a safeguard. 

I spent several man-hours organizing our data for easy interpretation.  

What makes this so dangerous is that some of these 10 deadly sins are quite ambiguous and a matter of interpretation.

To make it even worse, my attorney has advised that the 90 days has to be three full calendar months (in his interpretation) - meaning that the 90 days starts from the 1st of the month following your notice to them.

The same guidelines could have markedly different interpretations and implementations by different lenders.Lender A tells you that your rate is X, Lender B tells you that your rate is a little higher because they see that the program/product that A is quoting wont work because of some minute detail.

Contract does state: "Nothing in this Contract shall be interpreted to permit Seller to provide false, misleading, or fraudulent information to Buyer." 

Another guy wouldn't pass me at all because I showed him up...yet another kept insisting that his interpretation of a plumbing code was correct when it was not - cost me 1 month of time.A neccessary evil IMO, they were usually former GCs who couldn't make it in the real world.....  

However, I saw enough that I believe that the information available is so imperfect and subject to interpretation that large losses would be an inevitable part of the program, as well as large gains.  

Something has to get better in that market as the regulations are too confining and essentially up to interpretation by the city explore you engage with.

The only interpretation of what the Federal Reserve Bank (the head bank) is saying, is that "banks credit depositor accounts and lend the deposits".