It does later say in the agreement that it is:"binding upon persons who own, lease, sublease, or occupy any parcel or portion thereof"The inclusion of which seems to imply that long term renting and/or subleasing would NOT be commercial use.I'm trying to figure out if I'm taking a significant risk buying this property for use as an STR.

For this they get a big fat DO NOT RECOMMEND 

They can limit what property owners can do, including house hacking.Even if the city has no restrictions, if legally binding and properly recorded, covenants can enforce rules that supersede local ordinances for those living within the neighborhood.

It binds the landlord, but honestly has little binding effect on a tenant when they simply choose to leave.

The buy back was a comment over the phone, nothing legally binding unfortunately.

I go back to see what I sent them and I had fat fingered an address (389 instead of 380).  

No. 99.967% of the time it will be a big fat "no".So to everyone debating the effectiveness of a software, you need to realize what the scope of the software is.Software will return DATA, based on your filtering.

Marketing material from commercial brokers in all 50 states, for all sorts of NNN, isn't useful, and you aren't going to really get insights until you narrow your focus a bit.Starbuck is a nice easy thing to watch b/c they are all over and, since Americans have largely replaced their trans fat addition (McDonalds, Burger King) with a sugary caffeine addition (Starbucks), it's likely going to do well for a few decades. 

That is a big fat NO!

How much "fat" do you believe still exists within that?