When comparing investments it is difficult to be able to compare apples to apples.  

Generally if people are in town they stay with me till they have to go.Everyone wins.The downside is if you get a bad apple in the house it can and will spoil the entire bunch.

It is not really apples to apples, but generally speaking the more money invested the further ahead you will be eventually in the future, just because your compounding base is higher, regardless of where the money comes from - ie, 4 300k properties are 1.2 million on property, which is double the 600k property.

There is usually not much that compares with what we offer, so we only compete apples to oranges, so incentives are not a good tool for us.The types of tenants we want (multi year) also respond better to an adjustment in rent than an incentive.

It will co-exist with other "new" payment methods such as google pay, apple pay and credit card etc, because the target customers are different.

Yes the lack of identical apples-to-apples comps has been an issue in the area for years.

Are we comparing bacon to Christmas trees, to apples, to venus fly traps, to tomatoes, to grapes, to kelp? 

As apples to an IRA Hope that makes sense .

It’s not exactly apples to apples.

Your credit will only be hit once if the apps are all within a couple weeks, and this will give you the opportunity to make an apples to apples comparison.