This is in direct violation of the philosophy of owning and operating MHP's which is "owning the dirt, and you can't hurt the dirt".

80% of my government projects require as-builts, either submitted directly to them or through a third party architect ehich is directly or indirectly connected to them.

Some Realtors will pay for your leads, but their appetite will eventually be in direct proportion to the quality of the leads.  

Now with growth comes more indirect jobs in services within the community that will require a need for quality housing both rental and purchase as well.So my question to you BP is I am a self proclaimed Flipper (which I do enjoy) however, with the possibility of this huge (at least for this town) potential need for quality housing should I start to try to look at the buy and hold as well?

I'm unfamiliar with how the whole process works, but I have dealt with them before indirectly. 

You save a lot of time and hassle with properties like this, which indirectly also equates to $$$.I am not as familiar with O.C as I am with S.C.  

I certainly valued the crime maps however I can appreciate how this can be seen as indirectly oppressive to the communities of certain ethnic groups and income classes when a heat map turns people away from buying.

We're on our third multipropery/multifamily deal this year so this ties in directly with she discussions I've had with lenders recently.I don't know that I have any advice for you specifically that adds to the other suggestions I've seen here, but I do appreciate you wording your concerns so well.

However, there are things I just don't understand. " Here's the short version"So I get this referral to a guy for a opportunity that I have, we speak indirectly for a short while (PM's on another platform), he tells me that he would have "His Guy" come past and take a look at it...

May be direct or indirect, but the point is to be ethical and honest, and stop trying to bash the other side.