27 November 2017 | 4 replies
If you, based on market indicators, believe that there will be appreciation then hold on however we all know that's a gambling mans game.
3 December 2017 | 9 replies
and are all those accurate?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/beaf5/beaf513f23303c559102824ef6de4dc7b52deb1a" alt=""
14 February 2018 | 10 replies
First off, I know motivated was not accurate.
28 November 2017 | 3 replies
I uploaded the information in the Rental Property Calculator( assuming my input figures were accurate) please see the following.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af395/af395fa16a6e964e3359c2a4818fe22d4e6ac482" alt=""
5 December 2017 | 8 replies
If your ARV of $230,000 is accurate, then, the maximum loan amount (75% LTV) would be $172,500.Regarding your first successful BRRRR deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a3ad/3a3ad8c6c92d9f41d878df211ae8aff757e99801" alt=""
26 November 2017 | 3 replies
The best way to ensure correct filing is to have accurate bookkeeping and records.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bab5d/bab5d28e386518fbff3e5a38b3a749d3803f902c" alt=""
29 January 2018 | 54 replies
Deja vu from 2005-2007..........Yes, you need to leverage your equity to keep moving forward....wont argue that....but to pull out ALL your equity to go buy more properties in a very high market, sounds like a huge gamble to me..... use the leverage....hell yes.....but using ALL of your equity is a huge ALL IN bet..... you better be able to back it up if there is a big correction......Guess I'm just a wimp.....hope you are right.......
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fa95/6fa95ef500fd64ae0082d527ce3aa66f4e8aa9d5" alt=""
30 November 2017 | 22 replies
With that said - don't count on every agent to play by those accurate rules.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21841/218410af7169ff29d2a7b9b0407ea261b5c12010" alt=""
3 May 2019 | 17 replies
In 2018, we've now qualified under Tier II with a cap of $50 million per year.Would it have been accurately said in 2013 that "to fund the remaining 98%" of the $50 million we would "have to morph" into something we are not?
28 November 2017 | 8 replies
Alicia, this is not enough information to give you accurate answer, but what you propose might be considered prohibited transaction because of the involvement of "disqualified person".