The evidence you have is a tenant’s statement which needs to be more detailed and then examined to see if he has enough knowledge of the situation and if his statement is damaging enough (to a defense) and if he’s willing to provide a written statement or testify, and if his testimony will stand up to cross examination.  

Just be sure that if you are going to ask, ask everyone that reaches that point in the process.However, you might re-examine your approval process.

In other words, in my opinion, his business model does not lend itself to needing this type of self examination and therefore he is unable to comprehend the benefits of it.

i always like to pull the jurisdiction's hearing examiner files for applications and approvals. it can give you an excellent idea of timelines, requirements, common issues, community pushback, variances and vesting, development credits, etc... you can make a public records request for these files going back a few years, and settle in for a night's reading - these are often very interesting.... no part of these records are exempt from disclosure, btw. all the best!

There are several articles that surround the subject of "what improvements add the most value" (like changing garage doors) but I would caution you to examine your COMPS first.  

Both need to be examined by their respective accountants.

You can ask the franchisee for some financials to examine store sales and see what this ratio would work out in your scenario. 

Once you choose a strategy , come back to the forum to start examining deals. 

Therefore, there is no holding company to examine for any participation standard. 

It's worth examining if you haven't done so already.