Cheap materials, thin walls, the LVP was peeling already not to mention the transient individuals in the parking lot. 

I would prefer an individual PM (not associated with any company) to manage my 3 doors in FL..

>  Some LP want cash>  Some want alternative real estate>  Some want individual properties currently within the partnership. 

It's really up to the individual investor (and their coach who helps them create their criteria and decision-making process.)

For clarity; as with a trust, lenders do not exercise the "due on transfer/sale" clause when real property is transferred to the SAME individuals in an official capacity (e.g.

New landlord question- if I have an individual who wants to rent my place for their parent - who do I have fill out the application?  

I've included an example below to help illustrate this.So different lenders have different rates (which do vary even for DSCR loans) but these are factors they all consider.See example below:DSCR < 1Principal + Interest = $1,700Taxes = $350, Insurance = $100, Association Dues = $50Total PITIA = $2200Rent = $2000DSCR = Rent/PITIA = 2000/2200 = 0.91Since the DSCR is 0.91, we know the expenses are greater than the income of the property.DSCR >1Principal + Interest = $1,500Taxes = $250, Insurance = $100, Association Dues = $25Total PITIA = $1875 Rent = $2300DSCR = Rent/PITIA = 2300/1875 = 1.23DSCR lenders generally let you vest either individually or as an LLC.

Hawaiian real estate law differs from other western states significantly, mostly due to its monarchal heritage and the Bishop Trust influence.The basics are the same as would be in California; determine the condition of title ownership (individual(s), estate (including conservatorship, if appropriate) OR fiduciary acting for trust.Use a qualified private money equity lender to make a loan sufficient to buy out the cash-only beneficiaryThe legal community in HI and Big Island in particular is small.

As an individual investor it’s nearly impossible to wear all three hats and execute efficiently and effectively, especially on a large scale.

In other words, individual policyholders are subsidizing the losses. - Inefficiency with payouts and administration will be compounded as the FAIR Plan has zero experience with a major pay out and lack infrastructure of assessors and technology to distribute the funds they don’t have.