That is how I've operated for years, well before the NAR fiasco and as agents, we have always been advised from referring to status quo, standard, typical, etc when it relates to commissions.It continues to amaze me how many buyers/investors believe the agent value is finding them "deals."

If you're going to continue to work while you start to build a portfolio I'd advise to invest passively, at least for the first few deals.

And even though virtually every sponsor agreement allows me to share investment information with others who might be advising me on it (especially when club members are bound by an NDA), I still ask the sponsor if I can share it, because it's a test.

We were forced to call police & provide them with a 'Cease & Desist' in an effort to stop the harassment.Our attorney has advised that we do not engage with them in any manner.

The SEC attorney I've been working with advised that I would just need to disclose in the PPM that 100% of the capital would be used by my LLC.

It is ill advised to make any improvements until the property is insured and goes without saying the property is not financeable. 

However, as these terms are not used "scientifically" in the Solo 401k industry, it's advisable not to focus on those terms; rather, develop a sense of what's required to maintain a Solo 401k plan and identify exactly what is offered by a service provider.The upshot of all this is that once you've adopted a Solo 401k plan, it doesn't suddenly vanish or become non-compliant because a "plan provider" or "plan administrator" resigns.

Any advise as to other groups to join?

And for an OOS, I always advise to keep things simple at start, don't get greedy, go for quality and consistency, then work on maximizing monetization later. 

Per my recent conversations with Marco, he is working with a financial adviser and counsel on a restructuring plan to repay Norada Capital's noteholders.