
10 January 2018 | 3 replies
@Michelle EdwardsThat is impossible because of the privacy rules-thankfully.

21 September 2017 | 25 replies
The added privacy is a HUGE plus for me.

22 September 2017 | 11 replies
A tenant has a right to privacy.

21 September 2017 | 1 reply
Levi,I don't see why it being in a trust would raise any flags, i think the people who own the home just wanted an extra layer of privacy.

25 October 2017 | 8 replies
I wouldn't be opposed to combining the two with the right live-in multi-family opportunity with plenty of privacy between units.

5 May 2017 | 5 replies
The same is true for the USA.These decisions about your quality of iife are made by the 1%....You can think of this as a Sneak Preview....watch the limited coverage of key annual worldwide financial summits like Davos, where the 1% meet every year to make sure world finances are following the path they have chosen.It's going to be harder and harder to BUY real estate in the USA.I strongly encourage any of you that desire the financial investment rewards of owning real estate (and the privacy and the freedom owning your own home provides) to focus your priorities and take action now.

31 March 2017 | 1 reply
Phrased another way - is there a reliable way to determine the price of privacy offered by a SFP and decrement this price as privacy decreases?

3 April 2017 | 7 replies
Drop Box appears to have gotten passed it's privacy issues it had a few years ago.

11 April 2017 | 20 replies
I got my domain, with privacy, for $9.84!

6 July 2017 | 11 replies
Is there enough privacy between the units that potential tenants wouldn't be put off by there landlord living 50 ft away?