Securing a sponsor can be challenging, especially when they have concerns about your capabilities to manage the property and keep it profitable.So, let me share a suggestion that might make a potential sponsor more comfortable:Offer to have them oversee the asset and property management aspects, including the control over cash flow.

One of my tenants have security camera facing other unit.

It’s much harder for buyer to have a legitimate reason to sue seller when buyer had their own expert guidance.

But you've had numerous experts in this thread, including lobbyists and lawyers tell you you're wrong, why you're wrong, and you continue to refuse the expert advice.

And California also capped security deposit, thus literally robbing landlords by AB 468 that's faking human right issue.If there is class lawsuit, I want to be the first to jump on.But my question is, why landlords are so docile to this evil law? 

According to the experts at Realtors Property Resource—a premier data provider and a tool from the National Association of Realtors—we’ve got some interesting trends to discuss.

Lease should make tenant secure renter insurance.

Ask a local expert. 

Agreed, the "Syndication", "Private Equity Real Estate" or "DST" model are all variations of the same theme: - Pay money to sponsor who is supposed to be an expert investor.- Give them complete control over your money in the context of the deal or fund. - Wait and hope that they deliver returns. 

If you are purchasing an asset then you could cross collaterize both but if $ for non secured asset may be easier to look to sell the loan.