The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.Then last year HUD put everyone on notice when it issued some findings and guidance. 

Remember this is ARV (After Repair Value/Market) and what people will pay if sold with an agent - 6-7% commission is already inclusive to the price.  

This isn't inclusive but should give you a good start.

Its primary prohibition makes it unlawful to refuse to sell, rent to, or negotiate with any person because of that person's inclusion in a protected class.

However, because they invested where they did, they opened the door to a number of additional benefits not reflected in the COC return percentage; a few of which I'll touch on below:That figure is NOT inclusive the $75K (again, conservatively estimated) net gain in equity from their improvements.Chris and Sarah will be hand selecting their tenants from a pool of applicants; most of whom would be more than qualified to  BUY in any of the markets you suggested. 

Pricing is straight forward & all inclusive at $149/mth, whereas Mojo's can be a little cheaper, or more expensive, depending on additional services you sign up for. 

As a Montrose person, I really wouldn't mind driving to Ridgway to be more inclusive and share the drive. 

A "culture of inclusion" (i.e., not "religious freedom" laws) is mentioned at the very end.Now, as they say "price overcomes all objections". 

I can't comment on Manchester since I am not active in the central part of the state, but I have extensive experience with Rochester and the seacoast.In Rochester, the areas that are multi-family, and the areas of Rochester where good tenants don't want to live, are almost mutually inclusive.

If they want it out of their name, then sell it as a subject to or sell it as an aitd (all inclusive trust deed).