You could structure the deal with seller financing to bridge the gap.Possible offer structure:-Purchase Price: $170K - closer to actual value-Down Payment: Low or zero down to conserve cash-Interest Rate: 3%-5% - or better yet, 0% if the seller will agree-Monthly Payments: Interest-only or deferred until the sale-Balloon Payment: Full payoff in two years when you sellIf he wants $200K, you can still make an offer of:-$170K purchase price + $30K as a second lien due at closing-Seller carries $170K at a low interest rateHe would feel closer to his number, but you still keep within reasonable investment limits.2.

Looking my insurance policy it mentions that I can opt for settlement under Actual Cash Value vs Replacement Cost. 

If the new administration actually enacts their policy stances on tariffs, immigration, trying to ignite the economy even more....all of those things add up to higher inflation.

Make sure to mention that this violates the quiet hours policy and could impact their lease status.

Can you afford to have zero possibility of a tenant for those months that you don't have it listed?

It's a zero sum game.

Zero or negative population growth is a bad sign too.

If I had a good tenant and they continue to be a good tenant, I don't care where they legally get their money from.I agree that most S8 do not meet my criteria even without considering the source of the income.However, we have another policy that also works against S8.  

That will give incentive to refinance ASAP whereas these 0% loans the borrower has zero interst in refinancing out early.

If you used me as your target audience of finding a deal, I would tell you chances are zero.