data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31e74/31e745ff3bac8533abad2354e2f16f22cd8b7a2e" alt=""
2 February 2020 | 13 replies
After that, distribute the returns at a market rate based on who's doing the work.For example, assume the following.Land Contribution: $10,000Cash Equity: $30,000Total Equity: $40,000Project Loan: $160,000Total Sources of Funds: $200,000Land: $10,000Hard Costs: $145,000Soft Costs: $30,000FF&E: $15,000Total Uses of Funds: $200,000The joint venture can then be structured as pro rata split to an 8% preferred return and 50/50 split on everything thereafter if you are doing the work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6309/c63095def22cef088fc9b16055b029a2fc00f130" alt=""
13 December 2019 | 35 replies
If they do, they are either participating as if they were an investor, which means they are subject to the same terms as everyone else including preferred returns, or they invest separately and have a 100% claim on the pro-rata entity-level cash flow which makes a preferred return on their capital moot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51347/513479769b8056626334a8a28c6e92b3f6c9daee" alt=""
17 January 2018 | 17 replies
But it should have been nipped in the bud earlier if there was equity...Hawaii (HI Rev Stat § 667-31 (2016))(b) From the sale proceeds, after paying all liens and encumbrances in the order of priority as a matter of law, after paying the foreclosing mortgagee's attorney's fees and costs, after paying the fees and costs of the power of sale foreclosure, and after paying the moneys owed to the foreclosing mortgagee, the balance of the sale proceeds shall be distributed by the foreclosing mortgagee to junior creditors having valid liens on the mortgaged property in the order of their priority and not pro rata.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adf9d/adf9dd908d9c38cda5fe78de9a4ef228b0353f5b" alt=""
10 January 2018 | 4 replies
If so, I would guess an offset of the deposit pro-rata per day might be reasonable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/deac4/deac4add5bd9a378ca8f92e96be963fa40f8262a" alt=""
27 January 2018 | 7 replies
If a vote is required the investors vote pro-rata, so yes, a $500K investor has more votes than a $50K investor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26519/2651957d1eeca885feca254d1d227d8084e4c54f" alt=""
24 October 2017 | 4 replies
I will be using an FHA loan, and the seller will be rolling $100k of proceeds ($600k cash at close and $100k cashto sit in the LLC) for the pro rata % ownership of the property ($100k/$700k).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04e3d/04e3de2e5b66f32b3eb41d88b9e96355ba4458ed" alt=""
2 January 2019 | 9 replies
In general, RUBS allow you to split the expense of water, trash, etc on a pro-rata basis and add it to the tenant's rental amount.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83fdf/83fdf733307358b88f6954ff25079a2aacb7aa10" alt=""
27 October 2017 | 4 replies
Is the return from the tenants in line with the market adjusted for the pro rata square footage of the purchase price?
30 October 2017 | 2 replies
Account ClosedThe payments should be made pro rata in the same percentages as contributed by each Ira.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b7ae/0b7ae023b42d5b81a895f1cd58e9048c8559fcc7" alt=""
9 December 2017 | 8 replies
We subscribed the investors at historical basis which basically meant that we got no return on our money (we’ll, we got the pro-rata share of income while we still had capital in the deal but that wasn’t something you could retire off of).