I can not think of any instances (well, except for if you are on the unwilling receiving end of an eminent domain claim I guess) where improvements to the immediate surrounding of your Investments hurts overall returns. 

I found out yesterday that I am unwilling to purchase myself a second full time job in real estate. 

Here's the question:  current owner is unwilling to allow look inside or even pictures until in escrow. 

Thanks to everyone for the comments and for bringing up some items I had not considered like @Scott Mac with the amp draw for the new larger fridge.A few items to clarify:This is a SFR rental that was gutted and rehabbed soup to nuts so power for a larger fridge is fine.This is in TX and renter supplied washer dryers is common but not much else in the way of appliances.The supplied fridge is only +2 years old.I don't really have a place to put my fridge if the new fridge is moved in being an out of state REI.Tenant is unwilling to leave their fridge even if I give them mine in exchange.Tenant already has blown their deposit on repairs so there is no bargaining there.One idea I had was they could move their fridge in from their storage unit and move my fridge back to their storage unit on their own dime.When they move they either have to move mine back in or leave their bigger fridge.

Since you are unwilling to use your personal credit, you are basically stuck since banks will use your personal credit until you show your business can stand on its own.

@Dan Handford, in my experience legal fees tend to become hefty when there is another general partner/issuer level entity joint venturing and that JV agreement has to be laboriously drafted because the syndicator and the separate entity both require control, but are unable or unwilling to partner within the same management company of the syndicate.

Probably not worth the effort.Even if the previous owner had a move in check list at the time she moved in two years ago, the list may not be comprehensive, and any dispute would require you, the tenant, and the previous owner to reconcile...you are most likely dealing with two unwilling party.There is also the question whether an existing damage to a property, regardless of whether tenant occupied or not, is really between you and the last owner and or the current tenant. 

I selected this structure after reading about it BP and Paper Source, and also being mentioned by multiple "gurus", and since it made sense to me, It seemed as the best way to structure the ownership of my Notes.Having the CFD in the name of a trust with beneficiary being a LLC, allows for a more efficient process to take back the property if Borrower is unwilling to correct the issue (the 20% rule not withstanding).

Many "syndicators" have been unable or unwilling to find their own deals and so they sign up with others to raise capital to get a piece of the promote.

Seems to me from your representation that these tenants may be the type of people who will take whatever they can, then deem themselves entitled to it, and then be rather unwilling to let it go once they become accustomed to having it.