Most who propose this arrangement do so believing they are adding a layer of protection or separation between the property or themselves and the operation but that's total nonsense as well.

That is not what I'm proposing here.The certification isn't an endorsement of the investment.

In the H.R. 3936, Built in America Act, it was proposed to extend the 100% bonus depreciation until January 1, 2027.

However, that won't work for several reasons:  1) The lender is not going to finance the $15k assignment fee2) The lender isn't going to consider the purchase price in this example to be $150k, they would typically use the $135k price in the original contract, and 3) In this particular example they may not even use the $135k price because it's not an arms-length transaction since it ultimately boils down to a deal between you and your father.I applaud you for trying to be creative, but ultimately what you're proposing isn't going to work and it's going to make the transaction a lot more complicated than it needs to be.

What is a reasonable proposal to private investors for sourcing such a deal?     

I want to propose an owner finance deal but I need ideas for a win/win structure.

He loved my proposal to l/o the house, rehab it splitting costs 50/50 while I lived there rent free during the rehab.

Best,JacksonUsing ChatGPT-generated responses adds no value to a discussion of Colorado STRs but more importantly ... much of this is flat-out incorrect information.First off, it's laughable that "Breckenridge" would be proposed as an option for a first-time investor.

When someone presents to "tap" Private-$ we want to do as little thinking as humanly possible, that's to say the burden is on you the proposed borrower to present a complete, detailed "pitch" outlining the allocation of every cent, contingencies, time-lines, data supporting each action item.

More than likely but the proposed stadium location is not Chinatown.