They are all on separate parcels, paid off and occupied by long term tenants.

Hello, due to a hiccup on my personal credit history I am having issues getting approved for traditional financing outside of an FHA which I do not plan to use as I am not going to owner occupy.

I would also do a property walkthrough asap and determine if the tenant will be occupying the property until termination is possible or leaving.

Red Rock Development spent $50 million building the 600,000sqft warehouse (that Amazon now occupies) without a tenant lined up based off the projected growth. 

Four of the five units are occupied, and starting in month one, this property will cash flow substantially more than the house I sold to buy it.

We'll recalibrate how many housing units have been built, occupied, turned into rentals, sold and so on to see if the "so called" layoffs being bantied about actually happened.

Owner occupied united increased by 8.4%"Still, although the overall share of households that rented decreased, the number of rented units increased by over a million units (43.3 million to 44.6 million)."

the one time that a tenant clearly went over the expectation they had occupied the unit 13 years and full paint job was expected (normal wear and tear).I also have not found it difficult to match paint. 

On my street, only about half of the homes are rebuilt, and about half of those are occupied by the pre-fire owners. 

I'm wondering if that might be less of an issue for something more rustic and temporarily occupied like camping/RV.Any one have any thoughts, parallel experiences, or other basis for insight?