@Dorys PrenticeDon't read garbage from the Houston Chronicle written by unemployed liberal arts graduates who think they are experts in everything after reading couple blog posts. 

This allows administrators to be much more liberal in accepting assets and allows the ability to align with investment sponsors.

The reason this is done is policies are allowed to liberalize their coverage to include losses that other policies would not include.

You have hit the JACKPOT of resources for real estate investors.

We worked ourselves to death to get out of student debt as quickly as possible....student debt is one of the only types to stick around through even bankruptcy, but that's besides the point: having control of your money and not letting it just disappear each month to loan payments, is incredibly liberating and exciting.

LA is more liberal though than other areas, so that's just my experience.

If you don't think that's unlawful and unconstitutional you need to remember what country you are in.As my very liberal attorney said, "It's the first time in US history that I can think of that the US Government entered into a legal, two party, private contract and changed the terms.

Third, most builders will have in-house financing and will get very liberal in lending requirements if the market slows, pressure to move to the next project, meet quarterly/monthly sales goals, etc...which will give your potential tenants an avenue to own new it instead.

VA is a pretty fair state as far as tenant/landlord, but did recently switch and is starting to become more pro-tenant as it gets more liberal (ex: switched from 5-day pay or quit to now 14-day). 

You have hit the JACKPOT of resources for real estate investors.