data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e9d7/6e9d71d2f1f90f084fb1de2a9e0c500f13953ba4" alt=""
26 October 2017 | 25 replies
However, you are in precisely the right environment to find it!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad975/ad9753d7ae281dcfd24cac4e40a085284cd363da" alt=""
22 February 2017 | 2 replies
We would need more details in order to give you more of accurate and precised answer or opinion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2065/d2065586fa8d501fdcdae72fad1441c302427b7d" alt=""
8 February 2017 | 26 replies
.: Precisely why I posted on this forum so you guys can help me make an informed decision.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fcd0/6fcd0d5913cffd6ba4fea845affb3fd25fc2fe03" alt=""
14 June 2013 | 7 replies
It's always wise to be conservative when doing your estimates (both on rehab costs and ARV) so let's assume $220k ARV and $100k rehab costs$220k * 70% = $154k - $100k Rehab cost = $54k Offer...In my opinion a $40k range of ARV isn't acceptable and you should narrow it down so you can have a clear idea of what you can offer and what you can't.A more precise flip formula =Max Purchase = ARV - Rehab - Fixed Costs - Desired ProfitBut again, you need an accurate ARV!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d68ff/d68ff312b3d0f1805079e500a68ec1d8798ef0b6" alt=""
7 August 2007 | 12 replies
Without more info to disprove my assumption I would say yes.There is no need to tent at this precise moment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f3f1/0f3f1587de4e4c2095494d71c6b9cccc12cd3db4" alt=""
11 August 2015 | 5 replies
If you know more precise numbers, it is much better to use those than lump them into the 50% rule.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c37c/3c37cef9a8ad77c7105812d3ce78c9f2a206b8cb" alt=""
1 April 2015 | 13 replies
This is precisely a part ot the idea when Bill and I mention there are things you do not know that you do not know.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ea22/2ea223cd48446973be5dc08767c9ca23061b5a55" alt=""
23 November 2013 | 5 replies
I actually walked away from a 4-plex foreclosure that would have cashflowed very nicely precisely for this reason.
3 February 2019 | 7 replies
When I first analyze a deal, however, I like to be more precise with it and use the second formula you posted.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/738f6/738f65eb752fe9b00825800fcdeb55e14c149060" alt=""
27 June 2011 | 13 replies
But I think there's a difference between realism & precision. 5 different GCs looking at the same house will come up with 5 different numbers.