We are all set up with Eastside now and working towards securing a property under contract.

All of a sudden, EVERY application is coming back squeaky clean despite criminal records, misdemeanors, felonies, evictions that can be found with a public records search. 

You can use an amortization table to figure out about how much is left on the original loan based on how long the DOT has secured the property.     

I look at a 12 month commitment with a rent of $5850 + a $5850 security deposit.

If you purchase a tax lien certificate and the property is vacant, do you have any right to rent it or only to physically secure it?

The contractor may not have a good handle on what the public expects.  

Securing a sponsor can be challenging, especially when they have concerns about your capabilities to manage the property and keep it profitable.So, let me share a suggestion that might make a potential sponsor more comfortable:Offer to have them oversee the asset and property management aspects, including the control over cash flow.

As is typical with government intervention into the public markets, the intentions of this policy achieve the opposite.

And California also capped security deposit, thus literally robbing landlords by AB 468 that's faking human right issue.If there is class lawsuit, I want to be the first to jump on.But my question is, why landlords are so docile to this evil law? 

Lease should make tenant secure renter insurance.