If it's a single unit remote entity even if they own 10 stores and have no personal guarantee on the lease they can bankrupt that LLC and walk away.I require tenants to have skin in the game or I do not want to do a deal as a landlord.

Also - I'm sure this lender is familiar with Buffett's program but this structure is obviously a little different.Both Buffett's program and this theoretical program you are detailing put some of the park owner's skin in the game - but Buffett's is structured differently. 

The response when people hear how much skin I have in the game ($25k but will probably increase that this year to grab some additional growth coaching) with my education investment has been overwhelmingly positive.

What irritates me about this kind of thing is that it takes these homes off the market from people with no intention of buying, gives real estate investors a horrible name, ruins trust and credibility for the seller with dealing with anyone in the future, and makes a huge amount of headaches for those people out there really trying to do it right. 

This gets weird because now you're forcing them to speak to a pre-recorded message the minute they answer the phone which would instantly irritate most people.How do you break through that barrier? 

The idea is that you'll have 20% skin in the game.

There is a number of hard money lenders in Milwaukee, they all require that you use some of your money as well to have "skin in the game". 

Lol didnt want to put a skin color to Santa, everyone has there own beliefs. 

My suggestion to you is if you have a good paying job, then start saving money, so you can have some "skin" in the game.

Really almost everyone wants you to have some skin in the game or to have lots of padding so they don't loose money if you mess up.